Luminous Landscape Forum

Equipment & Techniques => Computers & Peripherals => Topic started by: bellimages on October 31, 2008, 10:03:28 am

Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: bellimages on October 31, 2008, 10:03:28 am
I've been holding off the purchase of a new computer/display for some time. I use Apple equipment at work (several MacPros, and Cinema Displays). And I have an older desktop mac with a Cinema Display at home. I love Apple gear, and want to stick with it.

My quandary comes from the fact that displays are in transition. I've been reading posts pretty carefully on the new LED powered LCD displays. There are advantages to this technology (no warm up time, lower power consumption, no color shift as the display ages). Unfortunately Apple is selling these new displays ONLY with glossy glass. I'm concerned with reflections, contrast, shadow detail, and calibration. I'm not really interested in your take on these concerns, since there is no real objective conclusions from what I've been reading.

My question is whether I should buy one of of Apple's current (florescent powered) Cinema Displays (either the 23" or the 30"), or hold off and see what they provide for us pros. Or would it be much better to spend more and purchase one by Eizo. If so, do I need to spend $3000-4000 for a 22-24 inch screen? Eizo has that size displays that range in price from $1300-$4000 Regardless of whether I purchase a display at this time, or not, I will not be buying a new Mac until the next generation chip arrive (Nehalem, core i7) .... probably around the first of the year.  I have held off this long, waiting awhile longer won't kill me.

One problem with buying a current generation display is that it may not connect via the same connectors (since Apple has gone to new Mini Display port .... abandoning the current standard DVI port). And if the new MacPros come equipped with the new mini-display port, Eizo's DVI connectors will require some type of adapter.  

I'm looking forward to hearing from you pros ..... or computer geeks. I've never felt so much turmoil over a computer/display purchase.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: Ken Rahaim on October 31, 2008, 10:52:10 am
Up front, I'll say I'm using an NEC 2690WUXi-SV. Prior to that I used Lacie SuperBlue 22 CRTs and for a brief time the Apple displays. In terms of brands, I'm agnostic. I think if you're limiting yourself to brand, you may be missing out. Ever since the first wide-gamut LCDs came out at relatively affordable prices 2 years ago (NEC, Samsung, etc), I've been waiting for the other shoe to drop (ie; for Apple's to follow-up w/ a high end display). Over the past 6-9 months I've really begun to wonder what's happened to Apple in terms of their displays. It seems they're beginning to fall a bit behind. And now, these gloss covered displays come out and for me, they're very distracting. I don't have any statistics so it could be the majority of folks like the glossy displays, but my colleagues (both illustrators and photographers) roundly disapprove. I guess this is the round about way of saying you may want to consider unhitching your wagon from the Apple display horse and look elsewhere.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: bellimages on October 31, 2008, 11:55:00 am
Thanks for taking the time to post your comments. In looking at the NEC display that you purchased, it looks identical to the Eizo displays (stand is identical). Does Eizo make NEC's units?


http://www.eizo.com/products/graphics/index.asp (http://www.eizo.com/products/graphics/index.asp)

http://www.necdisplay.com/Products/Product...c3-37506ddc9775 (http://www.necdisplay.com/Products/Product/?product=9bd245b5-7b0f-4f52-9ac3-37506ddc9775)
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: Graham Mitchell on November 02, 2008, 02:28:17 am
Quote from: bellimages
There are advantages to this technology (no warm up time, lower power consumption, no color shift as the display ages).

Plus longer life and wider colour gamut. For these reasons, I'm going with an LED-backlit screen next. I had my eye on the Samsung XL30. Eizo might be great monitors but the price very high.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: richardhagen on November 03, 2008, 12:12:20 pm
Quote from: foto-z
Plus longer life and wider colour gamut. For these reasons, I'm going with an LED-backlit screen next. I had my eye on the Samsung XL30. Eizo might be great monitors but the price very high.

Graham,
I don't know if the NEC is  an LED-backlit unit, but I was just wondering why you've chosen the Samsung XL30 over the NEC MultiSync 3090WQXi (http://tinyurl.com/6mtrg2)? The NEC seems to have great specs and it's less $$ than the Samsung.

richard
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: Doug Peterson on November 04, 2008, 10:12:40 am
Please don't buy any monitor until you've had someone competent show you the difference between a high-end consumer monitor (e.g. Apple) and a professional monitor specifically made for color-accurate still images (e.g. Eizo).

Much like a MFDB vs. a P&S the difference in non challenging images is minimal.

Seeing them side by side on challenging images is like night and day. Smooth gradients, noise/detail/color-accuracy in the shadows, gamut on strongly saturated colors... night and day.

Doug Peterson,  Head of Technical Services
Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer (http://www.captureintegration.com)  |  Personal Portfolio (http://www.doug-peterson.com)
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: kaelaria on November 04, 2008, 11:06:31 am
Why did you feel the need to post this all over the board??

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....c=29173&hl= (http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=29173&hl=)

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....c=29171&hl= (http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=29171&hl=)

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....c=29172&hl= (http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=29172&hl=)
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: bellimages on November 04, 2008, 11:12:04 am
To get more a response from more people. I'm sure that a lot of people don't look at all of the forums. Did I cause any harm? It's not like the usage of electronic data is costly for anyone.

Many times, I get different points of views from people viewing in various forums (as the one that I just posted on monitor size).
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: richardhagen on November 04, 2008, 12:07:42 pm
Quote from: dougpetersonci
Please don't buy any monitor until you've had someone competent show you the difference between a high-end consumer monitor (e.g. Apple) and a professional monitor specifically made for color-accurate still images (e.g. Eizo).

Much like a MFDB vs. a P&S the difference in non challenging images is minimal.

Seeing them side by side on challenging images is like night and day. Smooth gradients, noise/detail/color-accuracy in the shadows, gamut on strongly saturated colors... night and day.

Doug Peterson,  Head of Technical Services
Capture Integration, Phase One Dealer (http://www.captureintegration.com)  |  Personal Portfolio (http://www.doug-peterson.com)


I agree with all you've posted: Smooth gradients, noise/detail/color-accuracy in the shadows, gamut on strongly saturated colors. I've seen the Nec and the Eizo. Not side by side but I have seen them on separate occasions. The Nec excelled in every way. The Eizo is a great monitor. It is simply way too overpriced. From what I've seen, on both monitors, I can't make a case for buying the Eizo over the Nec. The Eizo is not worth twice as much as the Nec. I am not comparing the Eizo to an Apple 30" monitor which is total crap. I am comparing the Eizo to the Nec 30". They are both great monitors.

rh
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: The View on November 06, 2008, 12:08:28 am
Quote from: richardhagen
I agree with all you've posted: Smooth gradients, noise/detail/color-accuracy in the shadows, gamut on strongly saturated colors. I've seen the Nec and the Eizo. Not side by side but I have seen them on separate occasions. The Nec excelled in every way. The Eizo is a great monitor. It is simply way too overpriced. From what I've seen, on both monitors, I can't make a case for buying the Eizo over the Nec. The Eizo is not worth twice as much as the Nec. I am not comparing the Eizo to an Apple 30" monitor which is total crap. I am comparing the Eizo to the Nec 30". They are both great monitors.

rh

Why do you think Apple displays are garbage?

Any bad experience working with them?
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: The View on November 06, 2008, 12:10:53 am
Very important is even distribution of luminosity over the whole screen, and, ditto, have even color.

Eizo displays seem overpriced, but the farther up you go, the law of diminishing returns applies.


I wonder how many among you would go for an Apple 30" versus an Eizo 24".
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: digitaldog on November 06, 2008, 01:36:25 pm
Its very, very unlikely we'll see Apple ship a "Pro" high end display for this audience. A bigger unit? Maybe. Something that competes with Eizo or NEC, very doubtful. Its too niche a market for them. Just look at the direction they've taken with laptop displays!
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: GregW on November 06, 2008, 02:17:47 pm
Quote from: bellimages
One problem with buying a current generation display is that it may not connect via the same connectors (since Apple has gone to new Mini Display port .... abandoning the current standard DVI port). And if the new MacPros come equipped with the new mini-display port, Eizo's DVI connectors will require some type of adapter.

New graphics cards supporting DisplayPort, also support DVI on chip. It's part of the current standard. The problem is using a DisplayPort only monitor with a DVI graphics card.

The USD 30 for a Mini DisplayPort to DVI Adapter shouldn't be a deciding factor when discussing displays like the NEC and Samsung.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: bellimages on November 06, 2008, 05:07:00 pm
Quote from: GregW
New graphics cards supporting DisplayPort, also support DVI on chip. It's part of the current standard. The problem is using a DisplayPort only monitor with a DVI graphics card.

The USD 30 for a Mini DisplayPort to DVI Adapter shouldn't be a deciding factor when discussing displays like the NEC and Samsung.


Sorry, I'm confused. Maybe you can help me out. I'm planning on purchasing the NEC 2690 or 3090.

I will either wait for an update on the MacPro .... or purchase a current model. If I purchase one of the current models, there will be no problem. On the other hand, if Apple puts a new mini display port on their MacPros, will I simply need an adapter to connect the NEC display to it?
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: Wayne Fox on November 06, 2008, 10:47:57 pm
Quote from: bellimages
Sorry, I'm confused. Maybe you can help me out. I'm planning on purchasing the NEC 2690 or 3090.

I will either wait for an update on the MacPro .... or purchase a current model. If I purchase one of the current models, there will be no problem. On the other hand, if Apple puts a new mini display port on their MacPros, will I simply need an adapter to connect the NEC display to it?

that should work.  The DisplayPort on the MacBooks can be adapted to both DVI and VGA monitors, those adaptors should work with the new MacPro as well if they use DisplayPort.  I guess Apple may choose to provide a card with DisplayPort and DVI, since there is plenty of space (unlike the MacBooks).
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: GregW on November 07, 2008, 12:20:39 pm
Quote from: bellimages
Sorry, I'm confused. Maybe you can help me out. I'm planning on purchasing the NEC 2690 or 3090.

I will either wait for an update on the MacPro .... or purchase a current model. If I purchase one of the current models, there will be no problem. On the other hand, if Apple puts a new mini display port on their MacPros, will I simply need an adapter to connect the NEC display to it?

Yes. DisplayPort can drive DisplayPort, DVI and VGA.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: GregW on November 07, 2008, 12:28:01 pm
Quote from: Wayne Fox
I guess Apple may choose to provide a card with DisplayPort and DVI, since there is plenty of space (unlike the MacBooks).

It's not just about available space. By choosing DisplayPort Apple and it's graphics suppliers will not have to pay DVI royalties. We will have to wait and see.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: bellimages on November 07, 2008, 01:04:15 pm
Quote from: kaelaria
Why did you feel the need to post this all over the board??

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....c=29173&hl= (http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=29173&hl=)

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....c=29171&hl= (http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=29171&hl=)

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....c=29172&hl= (http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=29172&hl=)


I have to say that this post still ticks me off. Are you the internet "police" for Luminous Landscape?

As I said, I get varied responses by posting the same question in various forums (only 3, mind you). I'd guess that a majority of people, who visit the forums, only read a handful of them. And they come from different walks of life .... with varied knowledge.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: Doug Peterson on November 07, 2008, 01:14:39 pm
Quote from: richardhagen
I agree with all you've posted: Smooth gradients, noise/detail/color-accuracy in the shadows, gamut on strongly saturated colors. I've seen the Nec and the Eizo. Not side by side but I have seen them on separate occasions. The Nec excelled in every way. The Eizo is a great monitor. It is simply way too overpriced. From what I've seen, on both monitors, I can't make a case for buying the Eizo over the Nec. The Eizo is not worth twice as much as the Nec. I am not comparing the Eizo to an Apple 30" monitor which is total crap. I am comparing the Eizo to the Nec 30". They are both great monitors.

rh

They are definitely both great monitors (especially compared to general purpose monitors like Apple).

Just one quick note: Eizo comes with a 5 year warranty which includes the requirement that the monitor be able to return to it's original speced profile during the entirety of the warranty (they ship it with a slip that shows the original profile response).

Also, their support line is actually manned by knowledgeable and eager to help people.

Peace of mind aint cheap :-).

Doug Peterson,  Head of Technical Services
Capture Integration, Phase One & Canon Dealer (http://www.captureintegration.com)  |  Personal Portfolio (http://www.doug-peterson.com)
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: dsandford on November 07, 2008, 04:47:58 pm
Quote from: bellimages
Sorry, I'm confused. Maybe you can help me out. I'm planning on purchasing the NEC 2690 or 3090.

I will either wait for an update on the MacPro .... or purchase a current model. If I purchase one of the current models, there will be no problem. On the other hand, if Apple puts a new mini display port on their MacPros, will I simply need an adapter to connect the NEC display to it?


With appropriate adapters, you should be able to drive any recent monitor with a DisplayPort output.   However, if you're planning on using SpectraView to calibrate the NEC monitors, be aware that it currently does not work with Apple MacBooks and MacBook Pros that use the DisplayPort Connector: NEC SpectraView (http://www.necdisplay.com/SupportCenter/Monitors/spectraview2/)

-- D
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: richardhagen on November 08, 2008, 11:21:53 am
Quote from: dougpetersonci
They are definitely both great monitors (especially compared to general purpose monitors like Apple).

Just one quick note: Eizo comes with a 5 year warranty which includes the requirement that the monitor be able to return to it's original speced profile during the entirety of the warranty (they ship it with a slip that shows the original profile response).

Also, their support line is actually manned by knowledgeable and eager to help people.

Peace of mind aint cheap :-).

Doug Peterson,  Head of Technical Services
Capture Integration, Phase One & Canon Dealer (http://www.captureintegration.com)  |  Personal Portfolio (http://www.doug-peterson.com)

Nice try, but the NEC comes with a warranty of 4 years. And because I save about $3,000 buying the NEC, in less than 4 years I could afford to buy another monitor with the savings I have gained NOT buying the Eizo. Now, THIS is peace of mind! There's just no way around it. I've thought about this alot, and I can't justify buying the Eizo at their outrageous prices.

rh
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: Unkle Vito! on December 20, 2008, 03:15:27 am
Quote from: richardhagen
Nice try, but the NEC comes with a warranty of 4 years. And because I save about $3,000 buying the NEC, in less than 4 years I could afford to buy another monitor with the savings I have gained NOT buying the Eizo. Now, THIS is peace of mind! There's just no way around it. I've thought about this alot, and I can't justify buying the Eizo at their outrageous prices.

rh


Richard:

Just a thought...

Have you consider purchasing a Sony Artisan instead? It is far better than these two displays, and cheaper. Please checkout my two (2) ebay auctions, one of them is for a Brand New Sony Artisan, eBay auction # 270314160346.


Sincerely,

Unkle Vito!
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: digitaldog on December 20, 2008, 10:45:51 am
Quote from: Unkle Vito!
Have you consider purchasing a Sony Artisan instead? It is far better than these two displays, and cheaper.

Far better is a stretch! Look, I've got an Artisan, worked with the fellow who designed it. Worked as an Alpha and Beta with the product manager. Let it die, its 20th century technology.
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: richardhagen on December 20, 2008, 12:18:11 pm
Quote from: digitaldog
Far better is a stretch! Look, I've got an Artisan, worked with the fellow who designed it. Worked as an Alpha and Beta with the product manager. Let it die, its 20th century technology.


I could not have said it better.

rh
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: djgarcia on January 06, 2009, 08:43:49 pm
Which EIZO model are we comparing the NEC 2690wuxi to here?
Title: IN A QUANDARY ABOUT MONITORS .....
Post by: jack hecker on January 22, 2009, 11:38:28 am
Quote from: dsandford
With appropriate adapters, you should be able to drive any recent monitor with a DisplayPort output.   However, if you're planning on using SpectraView to calibrate the NEC monitors, be aware that it currently does not work with Apple MacBooks and MacBook Pros that use the DisplayPort Connector: NEC SpectraView (http://www.necdisplay.com/SupportCenter/Monitors/spectraview2/)

-- D
I just came back from a lexjet seminar which covered this topic greatly. The topic of monitors in a digital workflow was covered greatly and throughly. I have to agree for so many reasons that it would take pages to explain why but if your looking for a solid reliable workflow the proper eizo or lacie period. I'm sorry to Nec the hardware of course is simlar but the software is the difference. This is one area you should never skimp on if you spend at least two thirds of you photographic caareer behind the monitor would'nt you want a monitor that can do the job.