Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: dalethorn on September 17, 2008, 10:56:03 am
-
Given all the advance excitement about this camera, interest seems to have dropped like a lead balloon. Could be the timing, considering the new product announcements. Anyway, this is typical of what you'd get with a tiny camera like the LX3. I would like to see the same sort of images as these done with a Canon G9, which I assume would be better, despite the claims made for limiting resolution to 10mp with the LX3. I see that DPReview claims the 28-140 zoom for the G10 is better than the 35-210 of the G9. 28mm wide, to capture landscapes no doubt. On a miniature camera. Hmmm.
-
I'd like to have a few RAW files from this camera to play with in Lightroom 2.0.
I own a Canon 1DsMkIII and 40D, but I also own a Panasonic FX50 and it's a grea P&S. I like it because the lens retracts completely into the body so that it fits in a suit jacket pocket unobtrusively. It's the best digicam P&S I've owned so far. Prints up to 11" x 14" are no problem this little camera. I wish that this camera had RAW capabilities instead of just JPG.
Bud
-
I'd like to have a few RAW files from this camera to play with in Lightroom 2.0.
I own a Canon 1DsMkIII and 40D, but I also own a Panasonic FX50 and it's a grea P&S. I like it because the lens retracts completely into the body so that it fits in a suit jacket pocket unobtrusively. It's the best digicam P&S I've owned so far. Prints up to 11" x 14" are no problem this little camera. I wish that this camera had RAW capabilities instead of just JPG.
Bud
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=222208\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
There are some RAW files on the Web that are allegedly from an LX3. I should find a place that I can upload a few such files to. One funny thing, though - the LX3 was advertised as ~27mm deep, and it's actually about 45mm deep with lens fully retracted. Probably because of the format and focus slide-switches on the outer barrel.