Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: Tony Beach on February 17, 2008, 05:03:28 pm

Title: Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
Post by: Tony Beach on February 17, 2008, 05:03:28 pm
(http://photos.imageevent.com/tonybeach/mypicturesfolder/february2008/C1_AB06600.jpg)
Title: Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
Post by: Jeremy Roussak on February 17, 2008, 06:41:02 pm
Quote
(http://photos.imageevent.com/tonybeach/mypicturesfolder/february2008/C1_AB06600.jpg)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=175519\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
For me, it would have been better if you'd walked a few yards towards the peak on the right, so the whole bridge came into view. It looks as if there's a lovely light on the centre part, but it's not properly visible.

I see a rather uninteresting grassy knoll, irritatingly obscuring an attractive bridge.

IMHO, of course.

Jeremy
Title: Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
Post by: berbig on February 18, 2008, 10:05:51 am
Interesting picture. I have seen many pictures of this bridge, but never one that shows the terrain this way. May be I have to visit one day?
I really like the chosen angle because I can in my mind "walk" the hills towards the bridge.

Bernt
Title: Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
Post by: popnfresh on March 26, 2008, 06:46:20 pm
Nice photo of the Marin headlands. What's the bridge doing there?  
Title: Golden Gate Bridge 2-15-2008
Post by: hs0zfe on June 15, 2008, 11:47:13 am
Have you changed position (walked up to the peak)? Maybe a tele shot towards the town might have been interesting, too?

You certainly found an unusual view. Half of the photo is showing a grass hill Quite interesting, if this was not the only photo of the bridge.