Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => Discussing Photographic Styles => Topic started by: eronald on March 30, 2007, 04:38:56 am

Title: New Image Thread
Post by: eronald on March 30, 2007, 04:38:56 am
Time to post latest/greatest/favest encountered on the net, again.

Here is my contribution.

http://www.sportsshooter.com/port_popup.ht...240&i_id=575079 (http://www.sportsshooter.com/port_popup.html?mem_id=1240&i_id=575079)


Edmund
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: Graham Mitchell on March 30, 2007, 05:00:37 am
Maybe we should restrict images to those taken with medium format digital in this forum. Those images are from Canon DSLR.
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: rainer_v on March 30, 2007, 06:04:08 am
i cannot see the sense of this link here....
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: Dustbak on March 30, 2007, 07:43:34 am
Quote
Maybe we should restrict images to those taken with medium format digital in this forum. Those images are from Canon DSLR.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109578\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Not only that but the masked blur is so obvious and just a bit too much to the left the photographer should be ashamed.
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: 61Dynamic on March 30, 2007, 01:32:48 pm
Quote
Not only that but the masked blur is so obvious and just a bit too much to the left the photographer should be ashamed.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a] (http://index.php?act=findpost&pid=109597\")
Actually it was taken with Canon's Tilt-shift lens. These images were featured at Rob Galbraith's recently.

[a href=\"http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-8737-8912]http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_p...cid=7-8737-8912[/url]
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: Dustbak on March 30, 2007, 01:42:43 pm
Quote
Actually it was taken with Canon's Tilt-shift lens. These images were featured at Rob Galbraith's recently.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_p...cid=7-8737-8912 (http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-8737-8912)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109682\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Sorry but that image I find very hard to belief it was taken with a TS lens or at least that the specific effect is because of using the TS lens. I am cracking my brains to think of a tilt setting that can get the image in focus front to back but not right next to that or at places that are at the same distance.

I can see it is an IR image.
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: godtfred on March 30, 2007, 02:37:04 pm
Quote
Time to post latest/greatest/favest encountered on the net, again.

Here is my contribution.

http://www.sportsshooter.com/port_popup.ht...240&i_id=575079 (http://www.sportsshooter.com/port_popup.html?mem_id=1240&i_id=575079)
Edmund
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a] (http://index.php?act=findpost&pid=109575\")
Love the photographs, dont care whether its TS lens or PS creativity...

My turn, not medium format, and strictly not only photography, (its a flash site, so you have to click "miscellaneous, and its the picture thats number three from the bottom on the right hand column, also the one number three from the top is good.)

[a href=\"http://www.martinengh.com/]http://www.martinengh.com/[/url]
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: Dustbak on March 30, 2007, 03:14:54 pm
Quote
Love the photographs, dont care whether its TS lens or PS creativity...

My turn, not medium format, and strictly not only photography, (its a flash site, so you have to click "miscellaneous, and its the picture thats number three from the bottom on the right hand column, also the one number three from the top is good.)

http://www.martinengh.com/ (http://www.martinengh.com/)
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109694\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


You are right imagewise it doesn't matter how it has been taken.

After looking at it several times and longer I must say it is a very appealing image. I just wished the plane of focus would be a tiny bit more to the right.
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: howiesmith on March 30, 2007, 06:14:08 pm
Quote
Sorry but that image I find very hard to belief it was taken with a TS lens or at least that the specific effect is because of using the TS lens. I am cracking my brains to think of a tilt setting that can get the image in focus front to back but not right next to that or at places that are at the same distance.

I can see it is an IR image.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109687\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Could I suggest it is rotated 90 degrees and then "tilted."  Same as swing on LF.
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: David Anderson on March 30, 2007, 07:06:53 pm
Quote
Not only that but the masked blur is so obvious and just a bit too much to the left the photographer should be ashamed.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109597\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

All that he's done is fairly easy with the tilt lenses, you can rotate them ..

(http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c35/DAVID_S_ANDERSON/NZ06-138.jpg)

(http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c35/DAVID_S_ANDERSON/NZ06-139.jpg)
Title: New Image Thread
Post by: godtfred on March 30, 2007, 07:30:23 pm
Quote
Could I suggest it is rotated 90 degrees and then "tilted."  Same as swing on LF.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109741\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


To me it seems like the plane of focus almost stretches directly from the lens and into the picture, and not on an axis from somewhere on the right to somewhere on the left or vice versa, like a TS lens normally would give. Id give my vote to PS...

The canon lenses can be rotated, so no prob. there, but still... just seems too much for them (i use the 24 and 45 ofthen, and would not be able to reproduce the effect I see here, maybe on my linhof, but i have not tried   )