Luminous Landscape Forum

Site & Board Matters => About This Site => Topic started by: brianrybolt on February 02, 2018, 06:11:14 am

Title: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: brianrybolt on February 02, 2018, 06:11:14 am
I keep learning more with each section of your videos with Charles.  I used to think I was a good printer and knew how to finesse my images to make really fine prints but watching these vids will help me tremendously in my printing.

BTW, I love your 'Flower King' shot Kevin.  Makes me smile every time I see it.

Cheers,

Brian
Title: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Christopher Sanderson on February 02, 2018, 01:11:57 pm
Shooting With The Masters – Charles Cramer Part 5

This is the heart of our series with Charlie Cramer in which we are taken through Charles' exacting process of getting the best print possible.

There will be a several sets of 'printing' videos coming up in the next few weeks.

You can watch the videos here (https://luminous-landscape.com/shooting-masters-charles-cramer-part-5/) or within the Videos section (https://luminous-landscape.com/videos/master-charles-cramer/) of the site
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: pearlstreet on February 02, 2018, 01:19:36 pm
Thanks - can't wait to see more!
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: jackpinoh on February 02, 2018, 02:42:14 pm
I find this type of video--highlighting the artistic process--to be extremely valuable. Far superior to videos that focus on a specific workflow for all images or show "Lightroom/Photoshop tips." More please.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: RoyH on February 03, 2018, 12:40:06 pm
This has been a great series! I don't recall from any of the earlier videos, but what paper was being used for the prints?

Thanks,

Roy
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Christopher Sanderson on February 03, 2018, 12:55:26 pm
I am uncertain of the exact paper and will let Charlie answer that. It may be a few days.

I know it is cut-sheet fed through the Canon Pro4000 on which we will also have a short video.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: adias on February 03, 2018, 01:48:21 pm
Video question: Why is it that when filmed at a distance the display looks B&W (desaturated)?
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Christopher Sanderson on February 03, 2018, 02:21:38 pm
Video question: Why is it that when filmed at a distance the display looks B&W (desaturated)?
Couple of reasons: The screen was over-exposed by about 2 stops and most of the prints shown thus far are quite low saturation.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: adias on February 03, 2018, 06:16:27 pm
Couple of reasons: The screen was over-exposed by about 2 stops and most of the prints shown thus far are quite low saturation.

Interesting! Does that mean that your camera automatically compresses the over-exposed screen, instead of just leaving blown highlights (a nice trick)?
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Christopher Sanderson on February 03, 2018, 10:33:47 pm
Interesting! Does that mean that your camera automatically compresses the over-exposed screen, instead of just leaving blown highlights (a nice trick)?

Nope - not even the GH5 is that savvy! Corrected as best I can (compromise) in post grading where skin tones trump screen detail
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: adias on February 04, 2018, 02:19:34 am
Nope - not even the GH5 is that savvy! Corrected as best I can (compromise) in post grading where skin tones trump screen detail

Nice work!
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: DaveClark on February 04, 2018, 07:32:54 pm
Another excellent video.

I notice Cramer does not use luminosity masks.  Some of what he is doing seems well suited for them, for example increasing the brightness of the waterfall.  I am curious about his opinion on the use of luminosity masks. 

Dave
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Charles Cramer on February 05, 2018, 02:25:50 am
I use two main types of paper.  A cheaper one for making lots of proofs, which would be Moab Lasal Exhibition Lustre.  And for my final prints, Canson (or Epson) Platine Fibre Rag.  The Platine has a very neutral paper base, which matches white mount boards nicely.  That's because it has a real paper base.  The cheaper Lasal (made of plastic)  has a bluish tint.  If I'm printing a scene with lots of white tones (like a snowscene), then I'll start with the platine, as the more whiter the tones, the more the color of the paper base shows through.
I'd love to fine a cheap paper that has a neutral paper base...
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: RoyH on February 05, 2018, 09:58:39 am
I use two main types of paper.  A cheaper one for making lots of proofs, which would be Moab Lasal Exhibition Lustre.  And for my final prints, Canson (or Epson) Platine Fibre Rag.  The Platine has a very neutral paper base, which matches white mount boards nicely.  That's because it has a real paper base.  The cheaper Lasal (made of plastic)  has a bluish tint.  If I'm printing a scene with lots of white tones (like a snowscene), then I'll start with the platine, as the more whiter the tones, the more the color of the paper base shows through.
I'd love to fine a cheap paper that has a neutral paper base...

Thanks Charlie!

Looks like I'm in good company, I also use Moab Exhibition Lustre for proofs and other non-critical prints. I recently started using what I believe is a similar but different paper to the Platine Fibre Rag, the Moab Juniper Baryta Rag. I have somewhat standardized on Moab papers as they are easily available locally for me and I'm getting great results from them with my Epson P800.

Again thanks for the information and the education series of videos, they have been very useful!

Roy
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Charles Cramer on February 05, 2018, 04:40:26 pm
I have never used luminosity masks, because I've never felt the need. Let me explain.

My usual selection method is to do basically what Ansel Adams did in the darkroom.  I loosely select an area and feather it.  And then capture that selection in a curve.  This seems to work 80% of the time.  If I need to restrict the tones involved,  I can lock down a part of the curve.  If I want to dark tones to stay put, I put a point on the curve in that area.  You don't want too many points, as you can inadvertently create a flat spot on the curve, which can look terrible.

My worry with luminosity masks is of what I call tonal "constipation",  which is basically what a flat spot on a curve does. It crushes tones together.   Let's say you're trying to lighten midtones in some rocks.  If you do a strong lightening, then any brighter parts of the rocks that weren't in the luminosity mask won't get lighter.  But the midtones you worked on will.  And the demarcation between the selected and unselected parts my cause some crushing of tones.

I can see luminosity masks working, though, with subtle adjustments, not anything too extreme.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: AndersDamsgaard on February 05, 2018, 09:50:15 pm
Thank you Charles, Kevin, and Chris for this fantastic series. The pace is wonderful and the videos have a friendly atmosphere to them. I'm learning a lot and am having a great time putting the new concepts and insights to good use.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Peter McLennan on February 06, 2018, 11:08:36 am
What is so instructive about this series, Charlie, is what you do to the images, not necessarily how you do it.  There are many ways to achieve the same effect in Photoshop and you’ve shown us some new techniques. But for me, its your sensitivity to what can be done to the images that makes these videos so useful and inspiring.  Thank you!  8)
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Rajan Parrikar on February 06, 2018, 12:04:36 pm
I have never used luminosity masks, because I've never felt the need. Let me explain.

My usual selection method is to do basically what Ansel Adams did in the darkroom.  I loosely select an area and feather it.  And then capture that selection in a curve.  This seems to work 80% of the time.  If I need to restrict the tones involved,  I can lock down a part of the curve.  If I want to dark tones to stay put, I put a point on the curve in that area.  You don't want too many points, as you can inadvertently create a flat spot on the curve, which can look terrible.

My worry with luminosity masks is of what I call tonal "constipation",  which is basically what a flat spot on a curve does. It crushes tones together.   Let's say you're trying to lighten midtones in some rocks.  If you do a strong lightening, then any brighter parts of the rocks that weren't in the luminosity mask won't get lighter.  But the midtones you worked on will.  And the demarcation between the selected and unselected parts my cause some crushing of tones.

I can see luminosity masks working, though, with subtle adjustments, not anything too extreme.


Tony Kuyper's v5 panel on Luminosity Masks (and much more) is extraordinarily powerful and permits a fine degree of control and manipulation in short order (once you have gotten the hang of it). As always, with such 'power' comes responsibility. Tonal constipation is not an issue if you supply enough tonal fibre.




Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: PatrickEhlen on February 06, 2018, 01:44:44 pm
Mr. Cramer mentioned, that people often say his prints are too dark. Maybe he should change his background in Photoshop from white to grey. Just thinking.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: BrianWJH on February 06, 2018, 02:36:09 pm
Well, I understood that statement to be that a common complaint is that prints often appear to be too dark as a general statement often made in these forums, not that his own prints are too dark.

Brian.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: adias on February 06, 2018, 07:36:08 pm
Mr. Cramer mentioned, that people often say his prints are too dark. Maybe he should change his background in Photoshop from white to grey. Just thinking.

No! The perception of darkness decreases with darker backgrounds.
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: HSakols on February 07, 2018, 09:41:00 am
Kevin, Charlie:

So what do you do with all those test prints? 
Title: Re: Just Published - Part 5 of Charles Cramer
Post by: Stephan_Pawloski on February 19, 2018, 04:42:18 am
Kevin, Charlie:

So what do you do with all those test prints?

Why, he makes the coolest looking paper airplanes you've ever seen!

Charles, I'm loving this series and have a lot of respect for your work. You make images out of scenes that I wouldn't have even got out of the car for.