Luminous Landscape Forum
The Art of Photography => User Critiques => Topic started by: BobDavid on September 04, 2017, 03:47:26 am
-
Sept. 2
Sept. 3
-
The first one opens a wide flield for (any) interpretation and is very inspiring - and also visually pleasing.
The 2nd is a nice idea, but basically doesn't tell me a lot, really.
HTH
farbschlurf
-
The first one opens a wide flield for (any) interpretation and is very inspiring - and also visually pleasing.
The 2nd is a nice idea, but basically doesn't tell me a lot, really.
HTH
farbschlurf
I have to agree with Farbschlurf. Sep 2 is amazing and powerful.
-
+1
-
I have to agree with Farbschlurf. Sep 2 is amazing and powerful.
+1
Have you tried any different treatments ( processing ) of the image?
-
Fabulous #1!
-
The first one opens a wide flield for (any) interpretation and is very inspiring - and also visually pleasing.
The 2nd is a nice idea, but basically doesn't tell me a lot, really.
HTH
farbschlurf
The second one, Sep 3, is just a one-liner, a viusal pun.
-
+1
Have you tried any different treatments ( processing ) of the image?
I haven't tried other processing treatments. I took five photos of this scene, each framed differently. The one I've posted is the one that captured the moment.
Being that I sold my 24" printer prior to moving to Colorado, I've simplified my workflow. Processing an image for CMYK output is more complex than it is for viewing on a screen.
Both photos were taken with an Olympus Pen F in RAW. The files were developed in Olympus software. The difference between using a camera's native software versus Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) is striking. I am now using C1 for developing Sony A7r II RAW files. From what I've been told, C1 uses Sony's proprietary algorithms. The difference between files developed in C1 versus ACR is dramatic.