Luminous Landscape Forum
Equipment & Techniques => Cameras, Lenses and Shooting gear => Topic started by: brianrybolt on January 24, 2017, 06:48:46 am
-
Positive &/or negatives about this lens - can't find any decent reviews. I will be shooting with a X-T2 and need a 'walk around - street lens'. (weight is an issue)
Thanks in advance.
Brian
-
One of the Fuji zoom has been labeled as a dust collector. The pumping action of the zoom sleeve is the culprit, I'm not sure if this is that lens but I wouldn't choose a lens with anything over a 3 to 1 ratio for stills.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
-
I've been using the 18–135 since I bought my X-T1. I bought it for the same reasons you mention. It's very versatile with reasonable weight. I use it now with my X-T2. It has not sucked dust into the lens for me. It is WR so that's worth considering. With the X-T1 I thought the lens was good but not great. With the X-T2 I am more pleased with its performance with regards to IQ.
Here's a review of the lens.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/fujinon/xf-18-135mm-f3.5-5.6-r-lm-ois-wr/review/
-
I too use the 18-135mm lens on my X-Pro 2. Not as great as the primes but for walking about it is just fine. Last fall, I used it for shots at a botanical garden and the results were consistently well exposed, well focused and look good even in LR at 2X.
Dave S
-
One of the Fuji zoom has been labeled as a dust collector. The pumping action of the zoom sleeve is the culprit, I'm not sure if this is that lens but I wouldn't choose a lens with anything over a 3 to 1 ratio for stills.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
This is bullshit.
-
Stop being circumspect, tell what you really think.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
-
Well, you did make an unsubstantiated claim and some people may see that as trolling. In a different set of forums it may have received a far harsher response.