Luminous Landscape Forum

The Art of Photography => But is it Art? => Topic started by: bjanes on January 29, 2016, 12:03:42 pm

Title: Is this potato art?
Post by: bjanes on January 29, 2016, 12:03:42 pm
This article on the sale of an image of a potato for 1,000,000 Euros was posted on CNN. Personally, I think this is insane and the potato has no artistic value. What do you think?

Potato (http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/27/arts/potato-photo-million-euros/)

Bill
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Isaac on January 29, 2016, 12:27:16 pm
Do you think it less insane to pay $500,000 for a portrait photograph?

(Perhaps for some $500,000 is not even 5¢)

Let's not forget, Kevin Abosch is a visual artist.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: razrblck on January 29, 2016, 12:45:21 pm
Someone needed an exclusive photo of a potato from an exclusive photographer to validate themselves. I'd say art is personal and subjective.

If I could get away with selling that stuff to rich clients, I would without hesitation.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on January 29, 2016, 12:48:37 pm
This article on the sale of an image of a potato for 1,000,000 Euros was posted on CNN. Personally, I think this is insane and the potato has no artistic value. What do you think?

Potato (http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/27/arts/potato-photo-million-euros/)

Bill
I'd like to get the contact info for that "anonymous businessman." I have a bridge I'd like to sell him.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Zorki5 on January 29, 2016, 01:36:13 pm
I think this is insane and the potato has no artistic value. What do you think?

Unfortunately, these are two completely separate questions, and the price has nothing to do, at all, with the artistic value of the image.

You may want to check this out: High End Art: Everything You NEVER Wanted To Know (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AdjiHlIEsA).
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: ErikKaffehr on January 29, 2016, 01:41:46 pm
Hi Bill,

I usually buy my potatoes for 2.5€ a kg, so I think this one is somewhat overpriced.

Best regards
Erik


This article on the sale of an image of a potato for 1,000,000 Euros was posted on CNN. Personally, I think this is insane and the potato has no artistic value. What do you think?

Potato (http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/27/arts/potato-photo-million-euros/)

Bill
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: RSL on January 29, 2016, 01:51:06 pm
The potato sale simply proves Barnum's theorem once again.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: MattBurt on January 29, 2016, 01:56:47 pm
It's not anything I would buy or want but I never want to label someone else's creation not art. Just because I don't like or understand it doesn't make it something other than art if the person who created it intended to make art.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Isaac on January 29, 2016, 02:43:32 pm
Quote
…Kevin Abosch is a CONCEPTUAL artist from my point of view, who uses camera as a tool close to him. His ethical behaviour within a complicated story called art is the core truth about Kevin Abosch (http://www.kevinabosch.com/about.html), who will not allow, like some classical photographers or photography critics have, not to notice the person who is being photographed, but he will remove himself and put a person in his place to stand freely in front of the camera and Kevin Abosch!

So there!
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Petrus on January 29, 2016, 03:05:19 pm
I usually buy my potatoes for 2.5€ a kg, so I think this one is somewhat overpriced.

My potatoes cost 0.69 to 0.89€ per kg, so your potatoes must be more artsy than mine.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: ErikKaffehr on January 29, 2016, 03:46:29 pm
Hi,

Yes I buy some special kind, that is good for baking but a bit expensive.

Best regards
Erik

My potatoes cost 0.69 to 0.89€ per kg, so your potatoes must be more artsy than mine.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Tim Lookingbill on January 29, 2016, 04:43:36 pm
Maybe Kevin Abosch sees something in the potato that speaks to him. Like it means something and maybe for some strange reason it tells him to go to the Devil's Tower in Wyoming in order to meet up with the mother ship.

Wait a minute...wasn't there a movie about that except with mashed potatoes?  ;)
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on January 29, 2016, 05:09:38 pm
Maybe Kevin Abosch sees something in the potato that speaks to him....

He is Irish.

As side note, the sale seems like a good news for my home country, as the second print of the said potato was apparently donated to a museum in Serbia.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Isaac on January 29, 2016, 05:40:25 pm
… the second print of the said potato was apparently donated to a museum in Serbia.

The "…Kevin Abosch is a CONCEPTUAL artist from my point of view, …" was written by a Zivko Grozdanic, Novi Sad (http://www.kevinabosch.com/about.html).
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: AreBee on January 29, 2016, 05:57:45 pm
Tim,

Quote
Maybe Kevin Abosch sees something in the potato that speaks to him...

Dinner (speaks to an empty stomach)? Or do you mean the potato literally "speaks to him (http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Mr._Potato_Head?file=Thinkway_PotatoHead.jpg)"?
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: TomFrerichs on January 29, 2016, 06:03:05 pm
Hi,

Yes I buy some special kind, that is good for baking but a bit expensive.

Best regards
Erik

If you buy more expensive potatoes, does that make you a better chef?  Or could St. Ansel have done just as well with a cheaper potato?

Tom
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Tim Lookingbill on January 29, 2016, 08:59:01 pm
Tim,

Dinner (speaks to an empty stomach)? Or do you mean the potato literally "speaks to him (http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Mr._Potato_Head?file=Thinkway_PotatoHead.jpg)"?

I was thinking more of a "Close Encounter Of The Third Kind" if you happened to not gleam my reference to the movie in my previous post.

Several days ago cable TV news HLN's Jennifer Westhoven was explaining to Robin Meade the list of artistic attributes that qualifies the photo as art which I think went something like...

1. Color
2. Texture
3. Positive/Negative space
4. Shape
5. Lighting...and uh...I think she may have added specific to the Irish...
6. Distillation...as in potato vodka.

All qualities the potato photo clearly possesses.

Though I could be wrong on that last one. That list does resemble something I would've picked up in my art appreciation class back in the '70's in college.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: amolitor on January 29, 2016, 09:47:02 pm
Odder things have sold for more money, but this one is fairly clearly a hoax.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on January 29, 2016, 10:27:03 pm
...this one is fairly clearly a hoax.

Huh!? How so? Are you saying the story is completely fabricated? That he hasn't already sold his celebrity portraits for up to half a million?
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: amolitor on January 29, 2016, 11:54:48 pm
No, it's specifically the sake of the potato that has the true of a hoax, and not even one the artist is trying to conceal particularly.

The astronomical price and anonymous buyer, and the tongue in cheek artist's statement are not exactly subtle.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: GrahamBy on January 30, 2016, 05:59:06 am
I thought all of conceptual art was a (conceptual) hoax... so saying that this sale is a hoax is not an oppositional stance to adopt relative to the veracity of the artistic status of the photo, which by extension has been freed to circulate in the context of the subject (as signifier of all potatoes, the signified(s)).
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: torger on January 30, 2016, 08:52:49 am
Private sales doesn't count :)

An art auction is a much better value indicator.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Isaac on January 30, 2016, 11:11:35 am
… and the tongue in cheek artist's statement are not exactly subtle.

Is your claim that Zivko Grozdanic is fictional?
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: amolitor on January 30, 2016, 11:52:52 am
I mean a hoax not in the sense some complex of ambiguity about the meaning of the Art. I mean hoax in the literal and explicit sense of "the sale never happened".
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on January 30, 2016, 12:58:06 pm
...I mean hoax in the literal and explicit sense of "the sale never happened".

If that is the case (and I don't know if it is or isn't), then it speaks more about the sad state of today's journalism than art. If multiple news sources report this without fact checking, that is.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: GrahamBy on January 30, 2016, 03:46:14 pm
Some sympathy for the journalists in this case, since it's unverifiable. Of course in a different world, that might mean that it simply wasn't reported.
I don't think it makes the art-market any more or less ludicrous than it is already, so... meh.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Tim Lookingbill on January 30, 2016, 04:07:42 pm
No, it's specifically the sake of the potato that has the true of a hoax, and not even one the artist is trying to conceal particularly.

The astronomical price and anonymous buyer, and the tongue in cheek artist's statement are not exactly subtle.

It's not anymore a hoax in using the same type of valuation system as the S&P rating agency giving AAA ratings to worthless bundled securities that nearly brought down the economy in 2008. What was the damage? People lost their homes and retirement and no one went to jail.

I've been watching the wheels turn round and round going on 57 years now and I'm convinced our value system is run by gangs of like minded individuals who have access to resources that allow them to set value and prices and make it appear it's being influenced by naturally occurring market forces when it really isn't. But they'll keep evaluating them selves quite exorbitantly as long as all members of the gangs are on board including what they pay CEO's.

So a group of like minded individuals placing great value in a photo of a potato is no different (and no more a hoax) except no one is losing their home. And in a way it's kind of giving the middle finger to those other gangs of 1%'s who have no style or sense of humor about them.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: BobShaw on January 31, 2016, 12:57:41 am
AFAIK, it is all true and that it why it is the subject of my next assignment in a Photigy course to do a portrait style photograph of a common item.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Zorki5 on January 31, 2016, 01:58:50 am
If that is the case (and I don't know if it is or isn't), then it speaks more about the sad state of today's journalism than art.

It does say something about the state of art market though.

I mean, if you, say, read that a picture of cat's feces taken with an iPhone had been sold for $5m, would you be willing to bet some serious money it didn't happen? I know I wouldn't.  :)

And journalists? When I think of journalists in situations like this, one scene from South Park's Two Days Before The Day After Tomorrow comes to mind:

Journalist: We are not sure what's going on, but we're reporting that there is looting, raping, and cannibalism.
Guy in the studio: Oh my God, you actually saw people looting, raping, and eating each other?!!
Journalist: No, we're just reporting.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: landscapephoto on January 31, 2016, 06:19:04 am
There is a precedent about green peppers:

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b7/Weston-pepper30.jpg)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_No._30 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_No._30)

Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: amolitor on January 31, 2016, 09:57:32 am
Using the potato picture as a jumping off point to complain about how nonsensical the Art Market is, is silly. When a Gurksy sells for "too much" money at auction that is one thing, a thing in which some money is given by one person to another, and a picture is returned.

When Peter Lik or Kevin Abosch "sells" a picture for "too much" money, this is the important part, neither money nor a picture changes hands.

In the first case, you can argue pointlessly about whether a Gursky (or Picasso, or whatever) is "worth" that much money, which is a messy can of worms because value is something quite hard to nail down.

In the second case there's nothing to argue about. There was no transaction, there's literally nothing except a press release. It's like arguing that pollution is getting out of control on the basis of a 5 year old declaring that the sky is red.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: RSL on January 31, 2016, 10:32:36 am
Right Andrew. People who don't understand economics think they can assign their own idea of what something is worth to an object. Governments do it all the time. What something is worth is what someone is willing to pay for it.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Zorki5 on January 31, 2016, 11:01:38 am
People who don't understand economics think they can assign their own idea of what something is worth to an object.

OTOH, people who do understand economics always remember tulip mania (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania) and its consequences.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: bjanes on January 31, 2016, 11:09:50 am
OTOH, people who do understand economics always remember tulip mania (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania) and its consequences.

Tulips are beautiful flowers and it is understandable that there could have been over-enthusiasm for them at that time. However, a potato? IMHO, the image is without any merit.

Bill
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: RSL on January 31, 2016, 11:26:14 am
OTOH, people who do understand economics always remember tulip mania (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania) and its consequences.

And, so, what was the value assigned to the tulips by those who understood economics ? Don't remember reading about that. Fact is, nobody knew what the damned tulips actually were worth, and there are plenty of other examples of that kind of thing. The Great Groundnut Scheme comes to mind. That was a situation where the government was behind the fiasco and, as usual, taxpayers suffered the consequences.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: ErikKaffehr on January 31, 2016, 11:39:03 am
Hi Russ,

You explain that point very well.

Best regards
Erik

Right Andrew. People who don't understand economics think they can assign their own idea of what something is worth to an object. Governments do it all the time. What something is worth is what someone is willing to pay for it.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Zorki5 on January 31, 2016, 12:11:06 pm
Fact is, nobody knew what the damned tulips actually were worth, and there are plenty of other examples of that kind of thing.

Right. And, to me, sales of certain dubious artwork are very similar.

That is not to say it's necessarily a bubble, let alone a bubble that will burst any time soon. But the... err, potential is there.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: RSL on January 31, 2016, 12:25:29 pm
It's similar, but at least the people buying the stuff will have to suffer the downside, not the taxpayers.

It strikes me that auction goers pump each other up and preserve and boost a value system that has nothing to do with the artwork as artwork. It has to do with the objects as objects. I know I can enjoy a good copy of Le déjeuner des canotiers without having to own the original, but there are those who buy originals so they can have bragging rights. But who's to say that the artificially pumped up prices of those objects are the wrong prices? If you have more money than you can spend in a lifetime, what the hey? You and I can opine that somebody like that ought to spend their money in more politically correct ways, but we don't own the money, and it's their decision. I think it's stupid, but I don't think it's criminal.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Tim Lookingbill on January 31, 2016, 02:39:15 pm
The potato photo does have a kind of David Lynch vibe about it reminding me of some the other worldly and quite disturbing scenes from "Eraserhead".
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: pcgpcg on February 01, 2016, 05:24:12 pm
I've never heard of potato art, but now that I know there is such a thing, I think that because this is technically a fairly good photo of a potato and, for some, it could possibly be interpreted as making a statement about how very lonely it can be to be a potato when there are no other potatoes around, then I would say yes, this is potato art.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Otto Phocus on February 02, 2016, 07:26:20 am
The photograph of the potato is art if either the photographer, the viewer, or the purchaser considers it art.

If one wishes to apply an adjective to the word art, that would be subjective and everyone has the ability to use what ever adjective they feel is appropriate.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: RSL on February 02, 2016, 09:36:46 am
Who cares whether or not a particular object can be called "art?" You can call ANYTHING art if that's your preference, and you can turn up your nose at someone calling something "art" if it's not your cuppa tea. Unless you first define what you mean by "art" the word is absolutely meaningless.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: GrahamBy on February 02, 2016, 10:57:16 am
I like the photo, in fact. It is also coherent with eg his photo of the remains of a thanks-giving turkey. Since I'm vegan, I'd hang the potato but not the dead bird.

I wouldn't pay a million for it, but if someone else will, so be it.

I think I still prefer my three clementines, which cost about 4€ for the paper and ink. The fruit I ate immediately after the shoot, so its cost was fully amortized.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Tim Lookingbill on February 02, 2016, 12:40:25 pm
Who cares whether or not a particular object can be called "art?" You can call ANYTHING art if that's your preference, and you can turn up your nose at someone calling something "art" if it's not your cuppa tea. Unless you first define what you mean by "art" the word is absolutely meaningless.

With that strict, unbending way of thinking we can just write off the Mona Lisa as flea market schlock.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 02, 2016, 01:13:49 pm
Who cares whether or not a particular object can be called "art?" You can call ANYTHING art if that's your preference ...

Good idea, Russ. I find it very hard to delete my obvious "loser" images, but following your suggestion I think I'll make a folder called "Art" and dump all my rejects there.   ;D

Eric
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Isaac on February 02, 2016, 01:27:12 pm
Who cares whether or not a particular object can be called "art?" You can call ANYTHING art if that's your preference, and you can turn up your nose at someone calling something "art" if it's not your cuppa tea. Unless you first define what you mean by "art" the word is absolutely meaningless.

Your comment is meaningless.

You must first define what you mean by the words you used. (Before that, you must define what you mean by the words used in your definition. Before that …)
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: RSL on February 02, 2016, 02:09:51 pm
Good idea, Russ. I find it very hard to delete my obvious "loser" images, but following your suggestion I think I'll make a folder called "Art" and dump all my rejects there.   ;D

Eric

For a minute there I thought you were going to say you'd dump 'em on LuLa. Whew! (I've thought about doing that just to make a point.)

Now let's see what jabberwocky Isaac can come up with to knock this post.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: BradSmith on February 02, 2016, 04:18:50 pm
The photographer's quote from the original linked article about the sale says volumes about nearly all high end art discussion from the justifiers.  It is all just meaningless drivel.

"I see commonalities between humans and potatoes that speak to our relationship as individuals within a collective species," says Abosch.
Generally, the life of a harvested potato is violent and taken for granted. I use the potato as a proxy for the ontological study of the human experience."
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 02, 2016, 07:10:00 pm
Abosch: "I use the potato as a proxy for the ontological study of the human experience."
I think it would be more germane to use the excrement from a male bovine as a proxy for the ontological study of the human experience.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on February 02, 2016, 07:42:19 pm
I think it would be more germane to use the excrement...

Too late, Eric, someone beat you to it:

Elephant Dung Artist Scoops Up 1998 $35,000 Turner Prize (http://www.culturekiosque.com/art/news/rheturn.htm)
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: amolitor on February 02, 2016, 07:46:46 pm
An interesting thing that never really gets remarked on here is this:

We are expected to believe in Lik's and Abosch's sales because there are these other sales, Gursky and Sherman, with similar prices. This is utter rot, the high prices we see in actual sales that actually happened are all on the secondary market. These are specific pieces that have been rattling around for a while, that have changed hands, that have proved to have (albeit in that mysterious and incomprehensible world of high end art) some sort of "legs". People want these pieces, people have owned these pieces and have been persuaded to part with them for a profit. The value has been established, and re-established at successively higher price points.

Lik and Abosch, on the other hand, with their fake sales, are claiming primary market sales, where the prices simply are not that high. There's a false comparison here, which yields a false "well maybe" pseudo-legitimacy.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: GrahamBy on February 03, 2016, 02:47:16 am
Good point by Andrew.

In any case, after the two vernissages I attended on the weekend, I would have been relieved to see a well photographed potato.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on February 03, 2016, 11:42:06 am
FYI, the latest illustrated list of:

https://www.photographytalk.com/photography-articles/3289-the-73-most-expensive-photographs-ever-sold
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 03, 2016, 12:51:26 pm
FYI, the latest illustrated list of:

https://www.photographytalk.com/photography-articles/3289-the-73-most-expensive-photographs-ever-sold
Hey! How come I didn't make that list?
I just sold one of my photos to myself for $4,335,501, which beats out Gursky's top price (by $1).
I call it "Gursky's portrait of Cindy Sherman, with Potato, II."

 ::)
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Robert Roaldi on February 03, 2016, 03:21:20 pm
May just be a matter of exposure to the work. I find I like it better today than I did a couple of days ago. Maybe we need to wait a decade or two to give it a chance. :)
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Slobodan Blagojevic on February 03, 2016, 05:04:31 pm
May just be a matter of exposure to the work. I find I like it better today than I did a couple of days ago. Maybe we need to wait a decade or two to give it a chance. :)

It really isn't that much of a photograph, no matter how long you look at it. But that is irrelevant. It isn't the technical or even esthetic quality that made the buyer part with his cool million. There are only two other options: 1. expectation that it will go up in price, given the history and reputation of the photographer 2. personal meaning to the buyer. Maybe his ancestors perished in the potato famine, who knows.

I once saw an image in a Hasselblad calendar that almost brought me to tears. You know, nothing really special, it was, after all, just a pretty calendar image, often denigrated as just another chocolate-box cover, and yet... A simple, square composition of a tree, with fall foliage still on, mercilessly flogged by a sudden blizzard. And yet it triggered something deep in me. Can't find it anymore (if someone can, please send me a link).
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: BobDavid on February 03, 2016, 11:54:07 pm
Is it me? Or is Cindy Sherman's work dull and narcissistic?
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: amolitor on February 04, 2016, 12:25:53 am
Narcissistic as hell, but never dull.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Eric Myrvaagnes on February 04, 2016, 08:53:24 am
Narcissistic as hell, but never dull.
I must agree with Andrew.
I used to think she was merely narcissistic until I saw a big retrospective show a few years ago at MOMA in New York.
I was hugely impressed that she is a true artist (Definition: Fine Art is anything I like, of course.)

Eric
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: amolitor on February 04, 2016, 10:08:26 am
She works her butt off. You try making a group of 50 deeply narcissistic selfies without descending into tedium!
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: RSL on February 04, 2016, 11:25:55 am
I don't believe she succeeds, Andrew. I think she descends into tedium.

I can't believe I'm adding the 60th post to this asinine thread.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Michael West on February 04, 2016, 10:40:51 pm
the word BANAL springs to mind
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: BobDavid on February 06, 2016, 01:42:18 am
I don't believe she succeeds, Andrew. I think she descends into tedium.

I can't believe I'm adding the 60th post to this asinine thread.

Thank you, Russ. Well put.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: BobShaw on February 11, 2016, 12:41:14 am
With that strict, unbending way of thinking we can just write off the Mona Lisa as flea market schlock.
It is interesting that the Mona Lisa was not well known until it was stolen. People queue for hours to see a relatively small painting behind layers of glass when there are probably 50 paintings as interesting outside that they can walk straight up to. Even in the same room the magnificent painting on the back wall hardly gets looked at. Art is like that.
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: eronald on February 12, 2016, 10:49:17 pm
It is interesting that the Mona Lisa was not well known until it was stolen. People queue for hours to see a relatively small painting behind layers of glass when there are probably 50 paintings as interesting outside that they can walk straight up to. Even in the same room the magnificent painting on the back wall hardly gets looked at. Art is like that.

It is certainly the best known decorative element of Napoléon's bedroom.

Edmund

Edmund
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Rob C on February 14, 2016, 12:12:52 pm
It is certainly the best known decorative element of Napoléon's bedroom.

Edmund

Edmund

Edmund Edmund, there's no accounting for people's sense of the erotic.

May not be the kindest thing to have remarked about the girlfriends, though, but perhaps the pretty ones weren't known at all. You'd really have to consult the cleaning maids or breakfast service for that sort of information.

Rob C
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: GrahamBy on February 26, 2016, 12:13:12 pm
https://31.media.tumblr.com/4a5b6b04f214eef332b3f8a96072dd9c/tumblr_ng2lgrSkof1r3gb3zo1_400.gif
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: mbaginy on February 26, 2016, 12:55:11 pm
https://31.media.tumblr.com/4a5b6b04f214eef332b3f8a96072dd9c/tumblr_ng2lgrSkof1r3gb3zo1_400.gif
Great!   ;D
Title: Re: Is this potato art?
Post by: Michael West on March 12, 2016, 10:17:57 pm
https://31.media.tumblr.com/4a5b6b04f214eef332b3f8a96072dd9c/tumblr_ng2lgrSkof1r3gb3zo1_400.gif

Thank you! Just what the doctor ordered!